Categories: uncategorized
Date: 19 December 2007 23:24:59
Blimey another ethics post. If you're still here, read on. Imagine a debating chamber.
'This house believes that Christians should not tell their children about Santa Claus.'
Debater no.1:
'Christians should under no circumstances perpetuate the Santa Claus myth amongst their children. It takes their eyes off the true meaning of Christmas. Firstly, it is a clear lie; and parents must not lie, especially to their children - a heinous breach of trust. Secondly, the idea of Santa rewarding good behaviour sets him up as the arbiter of good and bad; it shows that Santa is omnipotent. Not God. Thirdly, God is the real gift-giver at Christmas; the Santa myth takes our eyes off him and onto presents - loving mammon instead of God. And fourthly, just look at the name. I mean, it's not even a subtle anagram.'
Debater no.2 rises to his feet:
'I won't really question the arguments that my opponent has made. I will simply say this: children need a concept of story, of myth, in order to be able to approach God. Denying them the folklore of Santa will result in a mind less able to grasp wonder. Long term, that will damage their ability to experience God. And finally, you have a duty as a parent to protect your children. If you tell them that Santa doesn't exist, they will blab this to their friends and get the s*** kicked out of them.'
So, do you agree with the motion?