the powers that be, or not to be

Categories: uncategorized

Date: 04 February 2003 15:42:00

that is a gramatically rubbish version of the question.

i am utterly scathing about the idea of territorial spirits; the best people who do believe in it are those who admit it is made up. ones that insist it is thoroughly biblical are pushing the limits at best (not in a good way).

anyway i'm reading a book called the powers that be and i know that although he is not into territorial spirits i can't help but read some of that rubbish theology into what he's saying, meaning that my understanding of what he says (that organisational structures have 'spirits', kind of meaning 'personalities' and characteristics in a way) is hampered by the fact that whenever anyone says 'spirits' i think 'oooh no you must be talking shite'. It's a problem.